<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nicholas Thorn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nicholasthorn.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nicholasthorn.com</link>
	<description>Adventurer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 21:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Lifehacker-style language learning tip</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/05/lifehacker-style-language-learning-tip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/05/lifehacker-style-language-learning-tip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 21:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholasthorn.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just discovered a nifty (but obvious!) helpful trick for learning languages, so I thought I&#8217;d share. Background:

I am trying to learn Danish (to a conversational level) but don&#8217;t live there, so find it hard to immerse myself in the language.
I am very time poor currently.
I have a basic level of understanding, but am trying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just discovered a nifty (but obvious!) helpful trick for learning languages, so I thought I&#8217;d share. Background:</p>
<ol>
<li>I am trying to learn Danish (to a conversational level) but don&#8217;t live there, so find it hard to immerse myself in the language.</li>
<li>I am very time poor currently.</li>
<li>I have a basic level of understanding, but am trying to get to conversational, and would like to be able to fluently read it.</li>
</ol>
<p>I have tried the usual language learning tapes/cds/programs (Rosetta Stone is fantastic, but requires significant time input) but it is quite difficult and boring to start with.</p>
<p>So, what I would like, is some way to integrate my practice as a part of my daily routine &#8211; that way I am more likely to continue with it and get to fluent with minimal effort.</p>
<p>Google to the rescue!</p>
<p>The excellent google translate tool works really well to give you a close-to-native understanding of a webpage, however it doesn&#8217;t really help for learning as it totally replaces the original text.  However, there is an option (view original) in the top right corner, that then will leave the page unmolested, but translate on &#8216;hover&#8217;.</p>
<p>This way, you can start reading the news (daily routine!) in a foreign language &#8211; at the level you are comfortable with. If you get stuck, you can instantly &#8216;hover&#8217; over the sentence, and google will provide you with enough of a translation to get the gist.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to try this out, and report back. Hopefully it is painless enough to become a part of my routine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/05/lifehacker-style-language-learning-tip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Four Hour Work Week&#8221; &#8211; Part 4</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/03/the-four-hour-work-week-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/03/the-four-hour-work-week-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4hww]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motivation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholasthorn.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 4 &#8211; L is for Liberation
This is the final section of the book, and in some ways, the most boring. Possibly, because after reading the last 3 chapters you&#8217;re all revved up and wanting to get started on something; and this comes as a little bit of a downer.
Disappearing Act &#8211; How to Escape [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Part 4 &#8211; L is for Liberation</h1>
<p>This is the final section of the book, and in some ways, the most boring. Possibly, because after reading the last 3 chapters you&#8217;re all revved up and wanting to get started on something; and this comes as a little bit of a downer.</p>
<p><strong>Disappearing Act &#8211; How to Escape  the Office</strong></p>
<p>This chapter is useful if you&#8217;re still in a job, for inspiration. It has a number of tips and techniques for liberating yourself from the workplace so you&#8217;re free to do all the good stuff in Part 3. Fair enough, and some basic sales techniques are used to coerce your boss into letting you go for it.</p>
<p><strong>Beyond Repair &#8211; Killing Your Job</strong></p>
<p>What it says on the tin. How to quit, and motivation to do it, if things are really not working out.</p>
<p><strong>Mini Retirements, Filling the Void, Top 13 NR Mistakes</strong></p>
<p>Basically, summarised it is &#8216;Now you have all the time and money you need&#8230; what then?&#8217;. Tim thinks Travel, and Learning. Fair enough. In my humble opinion these chapters are boring (perhaps they&#8217;re supposed to be motivating?), simply because virtually none of the readers will be in the position to need this advice. However, there are more useful hints, tips, and links in here.</p>
<h1>Summary of Part 4</h1>
<p>Less useful than the previous Parts, in my opinion. More pontificating about philosophy. Presumably once you get to this point you don&#8217;t need the book anyway &#8211; so I&#8217;m not entirely sure what it is here for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/03/the-four-hour-work-week-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Four Hour Work Week&#8221; &#8211; Part 3</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/03/the-four-hour-work-week-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/03/the-four-hour-work-week-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4hww]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motivation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholasthorn.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 3 &#8211; A is for Automation
Outsourcing Life
In this section, Tim outlines his ideas for amplifying your output through using outsourcing. I think you can apply this to a &#8216;real&#8217; business though &#8211; presumably that is what you do once you get past a certain point with outsourcing.
Tim attempts to say that employees can use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Part 3 &#8211; A is for Automation</h1>
<p><strong>Outsourcing Life</strong></p>
<p>In this section, Tim outlines his ideas for <strong>amplifying your output</strong> through using outsourcing. I think you can apply this to a &#8216;real&#8217; business though &#8211; presumably that is what you do once you get past a certain point with outsourcing.</p>
<p>Tim attempts to say that employees can use similar techniques. While I don&#8217;t doubt that they can, in most of the stuff I do this would violate non-disclosure agreements pretty badly.</p>
<p>He then goes on to talk about that it is actually about <strong>learning to manage people effectively</strong>. This I agree with, and can actually justify using as an excuse to hire a virtual assistant (VA).</p>
<p>However, it comes with a warning from Bill Gates, no less:</p>
<blockquote><p>The first rule of any technology used in a business is that automation applied to an efficient operation will magnify the efficiency. The second is that automation applied to an inefficient operation will magnifiy the inefficiency <em>- Bill Gates</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Some rules for delegation:</p>
<ul>
<li>Refine rules &amp; processes before adding people</li>
<li>Don&#8217;t automate something that can be eliminated</li>
<li>Each delegated task should be time-consuming and well-defined</li>
<li>Have fun!</li>
</ul>
<p>The cost vs output is discussed, and then the major concern that occurs to anyone about this sort of thing: &#8220;Sweetheart, did you buy a Porsche in China?&#8221;. Some mitigations for this are listed:</p>
<ul>
<li>Never use new hire</li>
<li>Prohibit small-operation VA&#8217;s from subcontracting the work</li>
<li>Higher-end firms have their reputation at stake, so are likely to be more secure</li>
<li>Don&#8217;t use debit cards; credit cards can be reversed in the event of fraud</li>
<li>If they&#8217;re accessing websites, set them up a custom login rather than using your own (especially if you use the same login/password everywhere)</li>
</ul>
<p>Basically just, &#8220;Be Sensible&#8221;, then.</p>
<p><strong>Income Autopilot 1<br />
</strong></p>
<p>This chapter is packed full of useful advice for starting an outsourced business. He points out that this business is identical in structure to how most of the worlds corporations are now run (eg, Microsoft doesn&#8217;t actually produce XBoxes, Nike doesn&#8217;t actually produce shoes).</p>
<p>The following criteria are given for a company (termed &#8216;muse&#8217; by Tim &#8211; because the outcome is maximum cashflow for minimum time input):</p>
<ul>
<li>Product based (service involves too much contact)</li>
<li>Affordably reachable niche market that you understand</li>
<li>Preferably groups that have magazines with decent circulation</li>
</ul>
<p>Brainstorm products that:</p>
<ul>
<li>the benefit can be encapsulated in a single sentence</li>
<li>cost $50-200 (well, price high, with good profit margin)</li>
<li>take no longer than 3-4 weeks to manufacture</li>
<li>explainable in a good online FAQ</li>
</ul>
<p>Tim then launches into a discussion about how the ideal product is INFORMATION &#8211; high markups, hard to copy. I think he is sailing pretty close to the wind here, because the reader suddenly realises that s/he has just bought information off Tim.</p>
<p>However the chapter is packed with plenty of useful links (may get less useful as time goes on) to look into for inspiration/business.</p>
<p><strong>Income Autopilot 2</strong></p>
<p>This chapter goes into more detail on the &#8216;muse&#8217;, specifically, how to test your market easily and quickly. I think this is fantastic advice for people starting businesses &#8211; but obviously it has its limitations. Essentially, the advice is to whip up a website, and start a google/yahoo advertising campaign for a week. Then measure your results and see which product is most profitable to sell.</p>
<p><strong>Income Autopilot 3</strong></p>
<p>The final chapter in this section is about once you have your product &amp; proven demand, how to build a company structure as efficiently as possible to fulfill it, while minimising your time input. Again, packed with useful information and links to read.</p>
<h1>Part 3 Summary</h1>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/03/the-four-hour-work-week-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Four Hour Work Week&#8221; &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/03/the-four-hour-work-week-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/03/the-four-hour-work-week-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4hww]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motivation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholasthorn.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 2 &#8211; The End of Time Management
Tim starts this section off by saying &#8220;Forget all about time  management&#8221;. What he is proposing, however, is meta-time  management &#8211; continually appraising whether what you are doing is  productive, or is there some way you can reduce the time that you are  putting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><strong>Part 2 &#8211; The End of Time Management</strong></h2>
<p>Tim starts this section off by saying &#8220;Forget all about time  management&#8221;. What he is proposing, however, is <em>meta</em>-time  management &#8211; continually appraising whether what you are doing is  productive, or is there some way you can reduce the time that you are  putting into tasks.</p>
<p>It is similar to the 4-Quadrant method that Covey  proposes in 7 Habits, however subtly different. For one, Tim&#8217;s focus is  on optimising for money/profit (his assumption seems to be that it is  only work time you&#8217;re managing) whereas Covey&#8217;s is on doing what is  consistent with your values (important to you). However Covey&#8217;s does not  have the continual (lean? BUZZWORD ALERT) improvement process.</p>
<p>What Tim really means when he says &#8220;Forget all about time  management&#8221;, is forget keeping busy, and focus on productivity. This is  fair enough.</p>
<p><strong>Efficiency vs Effectiveness</strong></p>
<p>In some sense, Tim&#8217;s description of this is similar to Management vs  Leadership. Management is the art of optimising delivery (efficiency)  whereas Leadership is the art of making sure what you&#8217;re delivering  meets the target (effectiveness). If you define the words this way, his  paragraph makes sense. He makes a good couple of points here and it is  worth quoting them:</p>
<blockquote><p>Here are two truisms to keep in mind:</p>
<ol>
<li>Doing something unimportant well does not make it important.</li>
<li>Requiring a lot of time does not make a task important.</li>
</ol>
<p>From this moment forward, remember this: <em>What you do</em> is  infinitely more important than <em>how you do it</em>.  Efficiency is  still important, but it is useless unless applied to the right things.</p>
<p><em>4 Hour Work Week, p 53</em></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Pareto&#8217;s Law:</strong></p>
<p>Tim then goes on to discuss &#8220;Pareto&#8217;s Law&#8221;, that is, 80% of the  results come from 20% of the effort. Through several examples, he then  applies this to time management &#8211; doing away with the 80% of effort that  is relatively unrewarding.</p>
<p>He then discusses how he has applied this to all areas of his  business (and life?). In some respects, this is the core of the 4 Hour  Work Week.</p>
<p><strong>Parkinson&#8217;s Law:</strong></p>
<p>A complementary &#8220;law&#8221; that he discusses is Parkinson&#8217;s Law &#8211; that a  task will swell in (perceived) importance and complexity in relation to  the time allotted for its completion.</p>
<p>He then has a suggestion for increasing productivity through using  these two laws:</p>
<blockquote>
<ol>
<li>Limit tasks to the important to shorten work time (80/20).</li>
<li>Shorten work time to limit tasks to the important (Parkinson’s Law).</li>
</ol>
<p>The best solution is to use both together: Identify the few critical  tasks that contribute most to income and schedule them with very short  and clear deadlines.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>If you haven’t identified the mission-critical tasks and  set aggressive start and end times for their completion, the unimportant  becomes the important. Even if you know what’s critical, without  deadlines that create focus, the minor tasks forced upon you (or  invented, in the case of the entrepreneur) will swell to consume time  until another bit of minutiae jumps in to replace it, leaving you at the  end of the day with nothing accomplished. How else could dropping off a  package at UPS, setting a few appointments, and checking e-mail consume  an entire 9–5 day? Don’t feel bad. I spent months jumping from one  interruption to the next, feeling run by my business instead of the  other way around.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><em>4 Hour Work Week, p 58</em></p></blockquote>
<h3></h3>
<h3><strong>The Low Information Diet</strong></h3>
<p>Tim goes after distractions in this chapter. He makes the case to  practice selective ignorance &#8211; to ignore that which does not get you closer to your goals. This includes:</p>
<ul>
<li>Newspapers/Magazines/Audiobooks/non-music radio</li>
<li>News websites</li>
<li>Television (except 1 hour of viewing in evenings for relaxation?)</li>
<li>Books (again, except for 1 hour reading fiction in the evenings to put you to sleep)</li>
<li>No web surfing unless totally necessary; you should have objectives for the day set out before powering on your computer</li>
</ul>
<p>Entertainingly, he proposes that you can use this to your advantage in social situations; rather than making small talk, you can be catching up on the worlds events.</p>
<p>I can see where Tim is coming from here, definitely. I definitely have far too much in the way of information-distraction going on in my life; however clearly some of it is useful. So there is a balance that needs to be struck &#8211; being aware of the problem is a big help &#8211; and I will be implementing some of the recommendations here after considering them.</p>
<p><strong>Interrupting Interruption and the Art of Refusal</strong></p>
<p>Here Tim groups interruptions into 3 categories and proposes solutions for each one.</p>
<p>1. Time Wasters &#8211; Become an Ignoramus</p>
<p>Unimportant &#8211; so hopefully you can learn to ignore them. Examples include email/mobile phone calls/meetings that are never that important. For email &amp; mobile phone interruptions a solution is to check your inbox/voicemail 2x per day maximum. For meetings, he points out it is important to have an agenda and that meetings should be about decisions, not definitions.</p>
<p>2. Time Consumers &#8211; Batch and do not falter</p>
<p>Group similar things together so you&#8217;re in the mindset when addressing them&#8230; pretty straightforward but easy to forget.</p>
<p>3. Empowerment Failures &#8211; where someone is waiting on your permission &#8211; Rules and Readjustment</p>
<p>If this becomes a problem (eg, in management) Tim proposes setting rules so people can get on with dealing with problems without your permission (eg, if it costs less that $50, just do it).</p>
<h1>Summary of Part 2</h1>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/03/the-four-hour-work-week-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Four Hour Work Week&#8221; &#8211; Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/03/the-four-hour-work-week-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/03/the-four-hour-work-week-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4hww]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motivation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholasthorn.com/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently got around to reading &#8216;The Four Hour Work Week&#8217;, and found it interesting. More interesting, in fact, than I thought it would be. So I decided to write up a summary/critique of what I consider to be the good bits/bad bits about Tim&#8217;s philosophical book.
Firstly, as hinted, I think this book is supposed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently got around to reading &#8216;The Four Hour Work Week&#8217;, and found it interesting. More interesting, in fact, than I thought it would be. So I decided to write up a summary/critique of what I consider to be the good bits/bad bits about Tim&#8217;s philosophical book.</p>
<p>Firstly, as hinted, I think this book is supposed to make you think. If you look past the Anthony Robbins/Robert Kiyosaki exterior, there are a couple of good points in amongst the salesmanship.</p>
<p>So here we go.</p>
<p><strong>Preface:</strong> Obligatory &#8216;I&#8217;ve-written-a-NYT-bestseller-despite-all-odds&#8217; paragraph. <strong>FILLER</strong></p>
<p><strong>FAQ: </strong>Allaying the reader&#8217;s doubts as to whether this book is really worthwhile. <strong>FILLER</strong></p>
<h2><strong>My Story and Why You Need This Book: </strong></h2>
<p>Bit of background reading on Tim&#8217;s AMAZING life. And how you can do it, too! Really!</p>
<p>Sets out one of the interesting fundamental questions for entrepreneurs, that is:</p>
<blockquote><p>In 2002, I was asked by Ed Zschau, übermentor and my former professor of High-tech Entrepreneurship at Princeton University, to come back and speak to the same class about my business adventures in the real world. I was stuck. There were already decamillionaires speaking to the same class, and even though I had built a highly profitable sports supplement company, I marched to a distinctly different drummer.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Over the ensuing days, however, I realized that everyone seemed to be discussing how to build large and successful companies, sell out, and live the good life. Fair enough. The question no one really seemed to be asking or answering was, Why do it all in the first place? What is the pot of gold that justifies spending the best years of your life hoping for happiness in the last?</p>
<p><em>4 Hour Work Week, p 13</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Which is fair enough, and something I&#8217;ve discussed at length with friends. Usually the answer goes something like (well, at least, it does for me):</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;So I can build enough of an asset base/perpetual income stream that I don&#8217;t have to worry about my  living costs. But I want to do it doing something that I enjoy.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>So this seems to fit with what Mr. Ferriss is saying &#8211; he seems to be preaching to the converted here, and perhaps it is directed at those (mythical?) employees whose idea is to slave away for 10 years in the City and then retire.</p>
<p>He then goes on to define the <strong>&#8220;New Rich&#8221; </strong>as a group of people who are rejecting this social hypothesis and instead living a millionaires&#8217; lifestyle already through (what appears to be) a combination of LBYM (living below your means &#8211; see fool.co.uk) and taking advantage of geoarbitrage. However he does make the assumption that a millionaires&#8217; lifestyle is one of travel and focussing on experiences as opposed to goods. All good stuff, if a bit American-centric (&#8220;WOW, Europe! How exotic!&#8221;).</p>
<p>A four stage process is outlined for becoming one of the &#8220;New Rich&#8221;, which, reading between the lines, is a summary of &#8220;The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People&#8221; by Stephen Covey:</p>
<ol>
<li>Definition &#8211; Define the objective; have a plan for what you want. Some assumptions about what is possible are tossed aside.</li>
<li>Elimination &#8211; Time Management the Tim Ferriss way. Pareto Principle; ignore the unimportant.</li>
<li>Automation &#8211; Hints for outsourcing businesses; the above chapter applied to managing a business.</li>
<li>Liberation &#8211; Now what do you do with all your time and money? Travel, apparently.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Chronology of a Pathology:</strong> More self promotion about Tim&#8217;s awesome life. FILLER</p>
<h2><strong>Chapter 1 &#8211; DEFINITION: Cautions &amp; Comparisons:</strong></h2>
<p>An example is given of a successful-but-unfulfilled millionaire. &#8220;Rich people can be sad too!&#8221;.</p>
<p>Tim then espouses his philosophy about life through the following statements. The <strong>&#8220;New Rich&#8221;</strong> don&#8217;t want:</p>
<ol>
<li>&#8220;To work for themselves&#8221;, rather / &#8220;To have others work for you&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;To work when you want to&#8221;, / &#8220;To prevent work-for-works-sake, to do the minimum necessary for maximum effect&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;To retire early or young&#8221;, rather /&#8221;&#8230; To recognise that inactivity is not the goal. Doing what excites you is&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;To buy all the things you want&#8221;, rather /&#8221;To do all the things you want, and be all the things you want to&#8230;&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;To be the boss&#8230;; to be in charge&#8221; /&#8221;&#8230; to be the owner&#8230;&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;To make a ton of money&#8221; /&#8221;To make a ton of money with reasons and defined dreams/timelines/steps (a plan). What are you working for?&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;To have more&#8221; /&#8221;To have more quality and less clutter&#8230;&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;To reach the big pay off/IPO/acquisition/retirement&#8221; /&#8221;To think big, but ensure payday comes every day; cash flow first&#8230;&#8221;</li>
</ol>
<p>Comments:</p>
<ol>
<li>This seems semantics? I guess fair enough.</li>
<li>Not mutually exclusive; efficiently lazy is a good idea.</li>
<li>Fair enough, good point.</li>
<li>Tim&#8217;s anti-materialistic rant. Fair enough.</li>
<li>Fair enough, I took this from the Buffett book too.</li>
<li>Not mutually exclusive, fair enough.</li>
<li>Efficiency again, fair enough.</li>
<li>Interesting point to consider.</li>
</ol>
<p>He then goes on to explain GEOARBITRAGE &#8211; that is, if you want to learn/experience/do something that is prohibitively expensive; find a country where it is cheap.</p>
<p>Explains the point that the amount you earn can be multiplied by the following factors (freedom):</p>
<ul>
<li>what you do</li>
<li>when you do it</li>
<li>where you do it</li>
<li>whom you do it with</li>
</ul>
<p>Comparison of the 80 hr/wk executive earning $500k as against the &#8216;poor&#8217; man making $50k on 20 hr/wk &#8211; comparison of the freedoms. How much is that extra salary worth. Fair enough.</p>
<p>Several examples of readers who have magically changed their lives.</p>
<h2><strong>DEFINITION: Rules that Change the Rules:</strong></h2>
<p>&#8220;Everything popular is wrong&#8221; &#8211; well, we can now see who he aimed the book at, you rebel you.</p>
<p>He then leads into a controversial example &#8211; how he exploited a loophole in the rules to win the National Chinese Kickboxing Championships in 4 weeks. Basically, weigh in was the day before and he used dehydration techniques to drop his weight 28 pounds; then pushed all the wee competitors out of the ring for a TKO. Well done I guess; but the example doesn&#8217;t sit that well with me.</p>
<p>He then leads into a fundamental point about pushing the limits to overturn social conventions. Challenging the status quo &#8211; examples of which then argued:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Retirement is worst-case-scenario-insurance</strong> &#8211; I agree with the concept, but his argument for it is flawed. I don&#8217;t know why he tries to argue this? Perhaps to appeal to people that feel it is too far off to consider?</li>
<li><strong>Interest &amp; Energy are cyclical</strong> &#8211; fair enough. In essence this is &#8216;don&#8217;t feel bad about taking time off&#8217; &#8211; I don&#8217;t know that it justifies 3 month holidays every 6 months though.</li>
<li><strong>Less is not laziness</strong> &#8211; focus on productivity instead of busy, fair enough.</li>
<li><strong>Timing is never right</strong> &#8211; fair enough.</li>
<li><strong>Ask for forgiveness, not permission</strong> &#8211; fair enough.</li>
<li><strong>Emphasise strengths, don&#8217;t fix weaknesses</strong> &#8211; I am not sure I agree here, and in any case he doesn&#8217;t point out what you should do about your weaknesses. IMHO you should know your weaknesses, and find people to complement them &#8211; but work on them yourself too.</li>
<li><strong>Things in excess become their opposite</strong> &#8211; fair enough, I spose.</li>
<li><strong>Money alone isn&#8217;t the solution</strong> &#8211; fair enough. Add this to the anti-materialist rant.</li>
<li><strong>Relative income more important than Absolute</strong> &#8211; money/hour worked is a better metric than absolute cash. Fair enough.</li>
<li><strong>Di-stress bad, Eu-stress good</strong> &#8211; fair enough, minimise harmful stimuli (distress), maximise beneficial stimuli (eustress): role models, physical training, &#8216;good&#8217; risk taking, expanding your comfort zone.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>DEFINITION: Dodging bullets:</strong></p>
<p>Escaping paralysis by analysis &#8211; this will be interesting as I definitely fall into this category. This is about when you&#8217;re putting off a decision for fear of the consequences.</p>
<p>Tim&#8217;s suggestion/strategy is to imagine the absolute worst &#8211; if everything did go completely wrong &#8211; then hopefully realise this isn&#8217;t the end of the world. Then he compares this to what would happen if it went best case, and use this as motivation.</p>
<p>Fear disguised as optimism. Valid point, that people staying in a bad situation and being optimistic about it improving (if it is within their control to do something about it) are perhaps living in fear. What is the cost of not making the decision?</p>
<p><strong>DEFINITION: System Reset:</strong></p>
<p>Being Unreasonable and Unambigious. Great quotes from Lewis Carroll &amp; GBS (incidentally, straight out of &#8216;Introduction to NLP&#8217;):</p>
<blockquote><p>“Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?”<br />
“That depends a good deal on where you want to get to,” said the Cat.<br />
“I don’t much care where …” said Alice.<br />
“Then it doesn’t matter which way you go,” said the Cat.<br />
—LEWIS CARROLL, Alice in Wonderland<br />
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.<br />
—GEORGE BERNARD SHAW, Maxims for Revolutionists</p></blockquote>
<p>Doing the unrealistic is easier than doing the realistic. <strong>Excellent </strong>section about how this is true.</p>
<blockquote><p>The fishing is best where the fewest go, and the collective insecurity of the world makes it easy for people to hit home runs while everyone else is aiming for base hits. There is just less competition for bigger goals.</p>
<p><em>4 Hour Work Week, p 41<br />
</em></p></blockquote>
<p>What do you want? Tim proposes that, rather than happiness, what we <em>should </em>be after is Excitement. Boredom is the enemy. Then he discusses how unreasonable goals are beaten out of us by the world once we get our first job; and that we accept the social norms. <em>This is something that needs to be discussed&#8230;</em></p>
<p>The fat man in the red BMW convertible story.</p>
<p>Dreamlining: Ferriss coins this word to describe the act of planning out to get to your dreams.</p>
<blockquote><p>It is much like goal-setting but differs in several fundamental respects:</p>
<ol>
<li>The goals shift from ambiguous wants to defined steps.</li>
<li>The goals have to be unrealistic to be effective.</li>
<li>It focuses on activities that will fill the vacuum created when work is removed. Living like a millionaire requires doing interesting things and not just owning enviable things.</li>
<p><em>4 Hour Work Week, p 43</em></ol>
</blockquote>
<p>He then goes onto discuss how to do it, with examples. <strong>Worth working through and doing.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Comfort Challenge</strong>: Learn to get comfortable looking into someones eyes &#8211; similar to the stuff in &#8216;The Game&#8217;.</p>
<p><strong>Summary of Introduction &amp; Part 1</strong><br />
- Summary todo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholasthorn.com/2010/03/the-four-hour-work-week-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
